• Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    God. If I though I could get away with it, I’d love to firebomb that cunts boat.

  • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy shit you people latch on to non issues when it suits your needs.

    "MARK’S BOAT, which he wasn’t in and had zero interactions with, MISSED A RADIO CALL WHILE ON ANOTHER CHANNEL, GET HIM!!!

    Like, actually pathetic para social shit.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look at you defending a billionaire. If his boat was nearby it should have acted.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes.

          It’s not unusual for multiple emergency vehicles to shiw up at a scene on land. Same thing can happen at sea.

          Do you think this is a gotcha?

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, I’m just not familiar with maritime etiquette. I don’t think you can compare that to vehicles on land. When someone’s on the shoulder and you are someone there helping them, there’s no expectation for anyone else to also stop and offer assistance.

            It does seem strange to me that so many others would be though.

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              When we went on SAR when my ship was ready duty, we weren’t the only ones that responded.

              EDIT: Closet boat is expected to render assistance. All boats in area are supposed to respond and offer aid if capable.

              Boats of that size would have multiple radios over multiple bands and would be required to monitor the international emergency channel. The second radio is used for normal ship to ship communication and you would have asked for their channel before switching to it.

              • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The emergency channel was not used. The boat simply ran out of fuel, in calm seas, just outside the harbour. It made requests for assistance on normal channels.

      • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Look at you desperate to be mad over a nothing burger. Enjoy your day. It’s summer if your in the North. This is so silly to be mad over. Touch grass.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      From my understanding you are required to use a specific international standard radio channel and be listening for distress callls while on the water.

      So if they were on the wrong channel that seems like a fineable offense.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It wasn’t a distress call. It was a call for non-emergency assistance. Like the difference between calling for a tow truck and calling for an ambulance. It wasn’t on the emergency frequency. The story is a nothingburger.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            According to the U.S. Coast Guard and the Marine Exchange of Alaska, which monitors ship traffic in Alaska, there was no distress call — just a general request for assistance.

            Coast Guard Public Affairs Specialist Shannon Shepard said by email that the Coast Guard heard the call for help just after 9:30 p.m. Monday night.

            “At approximately 9:56 p.m., the Coast Guard determined they were not in distress and issued a marine assistance request broadcast on their behalf,” she said.

            Alaska Beacon

            Article also points out that as a frequent visitor to the area, the cruise ship would be more familiar with the frequencies used locally.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find VHF to be very fickle. I can often only hear one side of the conversation, if at all. It’s probably my radio that sucks to be honest.