• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      read that study. it does not prove plants aren’t conscious. it casts doubt on the existing claims that they are.

      in the conclusion, they explicitly allow for the possibility that it may be proven that plants are conscious.

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        it does not prove plants aren’t conscious

        Because a negative can’t be proven.

        it casts doubt on the existing claims that they are.

        Because evidence does not support those claims.

        Theists use this same fallacious logic to pretend it’s acceptable to worship bronze age death gods.

        Let’s all use our brains, please.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        good catch. also the end of this so-called study has a bunch of bunk too:

        Data availability

        Not applicable.

        Compliance with ethical standards

        Conflict of interest

        The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

        Ethics approval

        Not applicable.

        Consent to participate

        All authors consent.

        Code availability

        Not applicable.

        i cant imagine how this thing got printed. it looks like something rfk junior spat out.

        All that is missing is working out topless in some blue jeans with raw milk in a hot tub and kid rock smaking himself in the face failing a mic drop.

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        in the conclusion, they explicitly allow for the possibility that it may be proven that plants are conscious.

        Do they? Please provide a quote, I’m not seeing anything like that in the conclusion.

        Here’s the other thing: even if you are correct (which is not likely based on evidence), consuming plants instead of meat still reduces suffering. Eating plants directly is more efficient than eating animals that eat plants.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          even if you are correct (which is not likely based on evidence), consuming plants instead of meat still reduces suffering. Eating plants directly is more efficient than eating animals that eat plants.

          this has nothing to do with what I e been saying at all, and I am correct, as you explained in your other comment

              • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                This doesn’t prove your claim, which you have failed to substantiate at all.

                As I said, it’s the same cancerous, selfish inability to acknowledge what is most likely true that theists exhibit.

                Do you believe a purple unicorn lives on the moon? I don’t. We have never observed a unicorn of any color, on earth or on the moon. Similarly, we have never observed plant consciousness, despite many attempts. Does that prove there is not a purple unicorn on the moon? No. But if you tell me there is without evidence, without knowing yourself, you’re lying to me. Lies cost lives.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          In conclusion, we feel we must speak forcefully: plant neurobiologists have become serial speculationists. The ratio of speculation to data in their oeuvre is astronomically high. If they want to form a sensible hypothesis and then test it with real experiments, that is fine, but the prolific speculating and fantasizing need to stop.