You must log in or # to comment.
Try spinning, that’s a neat trick!
that toilet seat looks comfy ngl
I dont want noise cancelling, I want bass boosted
Don’t slop believing…
deleted by creator
I haven’t sat on a cushioned toilet seat in a long time
It’d be really uncomfortable to use. It’d be like sitting on headphones, but with more texture. Doing your business on that would be pretty unpleasant.
It would become REALLY unpleasant once the “pleatherette” coating on the seat starts to disintegrate and stick to your skin, like the ear cushions do.
For the premium prices they charge for their kit, Bose plastics break down pretty damn quick.
I’ve got a pair of Denon cans (AH-D210s) from 1998 with cords that are as supple and nice as the day they were bought (ofc the pads have been replaced multiple times since the foam always goes flat first) and the plastic on my Bose earbud wires disintegrated within 18 months… Color me unimpressed.
Ugh.
Unslopped
This one makes less sense though given that Bose is THE brand known for ANC. Does Logitech do ANC too?
How do you guys know it’s slop? I’m kinda bad at recognizing
Slop always kinda has an uncanny look to it to me
I wasn’t sure, so I checked the comments. My suspicions where raised because it seemed like a lot of image editing effort for the joke and also the glass looked wrong-ish.
Oh yeah, that glass typically has 2 panels for sliding
For me it’s because it looks too much like a headphone. If you look at the seat, it basically has the headphone controls on it which makes no sense.
If a human was to make this, it would be a toilet that looks like a bose headphone. But instead it looks like headphone components morphed into a toilet.
For me it’s a bit too perfect. A human could definitely have achieved the same result, but I’m not sure someone who would spend this much time perfecting an image like that would add the glow on the floor that seemingly comes from nowhere with no purpose.
I agree with you, detecting AI slop is becoming extremely hard for me. Sometimes, like in this example, you can ask for what purpose something was done. Why is the underglow in there, and where does the light come from? A human staring at this image for at least a handful of hours would have made decisions about it, someone generating the image wouldn’t really think about it and just go “eh looks cool”.
Implausible design/architecture and scale. I don’t believe anyone would go in so much lengths to build this so cleanly in this style just for few likes on a shitpost (although, I admit some people are crazy committed) Prompting an AI is easier and cheaper. So, most likely AI slop.
Wow! A silent shitpost.
also, to hell with this AI slop shit. All memes now should include a second pane that includes the process workflow, including Photoshop/GIMP layers if applicable. I want to see your work!
That’s why this is an intentionally terrible crop of an otherwise very popular and well-known meme.
Alright cowboy you got it
Shit
Perfect, not one flaw. Super Intelligence indeed! dontlooktooclose
You wasted resources on removing the glow and adding something I could’ve done in Paint. Good job.
Art requires sacrifice
Good thing this isn’t art tho or I’d feel bad about flushing all that water down the noise cancelling toilet
A critique! Even more than I had hoped for!
Just imagine setting a tree on fire every time you generate one of those images.
Buddy, I’ve been doing graphic design like this for over 30 years. In my head, I’m setting everything on fire every time I create a new layer in Photoshop, lol. But that’s in my head, not in reality, because I do it myself rather than with AI.
Edit: what teeny-weenie asshole thought that this comment was enough to downvote this? Lol.
Now THAT’S what I call a workflow
lol
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
All memes now should include a second pane that includes the process workflow, including Photoshop/GIMP layers if applicable.
You can just AI generate the Photoshop GUI with whatever layers you want. That wouldn’t really prove anything.
Go on then. Do that. I’d like to see one done that is believable when examined closely enough.
I’ll believe it when I see it. And, of course, show your workflow. I don’t want you taking some screenshot of Photoshop from your own desktop or from Google images and claiming that it was AI in some absurdly ironic move.
I said you can. I certainly can’t use this newfangled AI stuff.
Professing such ignorance after making such a specific accusation is extremely obvious bad faith bullshit.
And with such Trumpian weasel-wordplay…
A Wendy’s?
That’s an overreaction. Especially considering this person is professing to be anti-ai. Why would they want to use it to prove it works to some rando?
A little sensitive and defensive for someone who can’t prove their position.…
You got really upset and compared someone to trump because they said it’s possible to fake things with AI but they didn’t want to take the time to do it themselves. Nah you’re right, I am sensitive and defensive for noticing that.
That’s inherently implying that I would, which is extremely insulting considering everything I just said.
You can
Maybe you can, but a reasonable person wouldn’t
Lucky for you I’m not reasonable
Sorry, I can’t hear you over the sound of my ass flushing (or whatever is happening in this meme)
