• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    English is gender neutral. You have to deliberately apply a gender to something unless that word is gender specific, like cow or bitch referring to female animals.

    In my brief forays learning other languages one of the more frustrating things to learn is that you can have female refrigerators, male buses, and gender neutral roofs. That is not gender neutrality.

    So I don’t get your issue with genders, seeing as they have nothing to do with English language neutrality and everything to do with how you address a specific individual at their request.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      In one of the languages I know, there isn’t a different pronoun for each gender; there’s just one pronoun to indicate ‘they’ in the singular form. Maybe that’s what they meant.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      In what fucked up language are refrigerators female? They’re obviously male.

    • no_name_dev_from_hell@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In Persian we don’t have genders for anything. No words, no pronouns, nothing. So having gendered pronouns for me is not gender neutral. I would rather call everyone equally “they” than get into this game of what are you identifying yourself because it makes the language more complex for me.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        How is it more difficult? If someone’s name is Joe Smith, you would commonly expect to refer to them as Joe. But say they ask you to refer to them as Mr. Smith. Ok, no big deal, right?

        Referring to someone by their preferred pronoun is no different. If Joe wants to be “they”, it’s no big deal.

        The apparent issue is with gender and people’s personal hang ups with it. People change how they address others all the time, formally, informally, professionally, familiar, marriage name change, etc. So all I’m getting here is resistance to what…? LBGTQ people?

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            In English, when we say “gendered language”, we mean “grammatically gendered language”, not just “language has gendered pronouns”.

              • sparkle@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                A language doesn’t “have gender” in any way other than noun class. Gender is cultural and exists outside of the confines of language. So “gendered language” would likely be referring to grammatical gender and not gender.

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The original commenter who used the term “gender neutral language” meant “non-grammatically gendered language”, that much is clear from context. It was a semantic mistake. Hopefully things are cleared up for you now. If you have a point beyond semantics, feel free to make it.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        From zero to insult in one post? C’mon man, your incorrect use of terms isn’t my problem. I don’t need a PhD in linguistics to meet your unstated requirements to have an opinion on this.

        If you want gender neutral pronouns in order to avoid the inconvenience of having to address the groups of people you singled out, like LGBTQ, that’s what you should have said instead of clearly specifying an entire language’s use of gender. You obviously know the difference in your ragepost, so next time spend some effort to get your message across correctly the first time and don’t have a fit when people can’t read your mind.

        I think you should also understand that even if gender neutral informal pronouns like “they” do develop and become common usage, you’re still going to have to learn to address people in their preferred pronoun if they ask.