Any Accountability At All Commission

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I will believe Impeachment means something once someone is removed from power until then it’s a political threat that means nothing.

      At this point it’s an untested power.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Arguably, it has been tested, several times. Each time it failed, after a fashion. We should be concerned what message that sends to the next person who would contemplate engaging in such impeachment-actionable behaviors.

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The third political party in the US should be The Woodchipper. You don’t vote for candidates, just The Woodchipper. If The Woodchipper gets the majority of votes, all the candidates on the ticket get tossed in a fucking woodchipper and we start the election over with new candidates.

    This fixes our problems, in a uniquely American way.

  • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why stop there? Have every President, Senator, and Member of Congress investigated at all times. Whether we think they’re corrupt or not.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s innocent until proven guilty, not innocent until investigated.

        But yes, it would be politicized immediately. If only there was a way to have bad faith actors run a government smoothly, then we’d be cooking with gas.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Getting the money out of elections would go a long way. The problem is that more than half the ones who need to choose to get the money out benefit from it.

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They should, but don’t, and haven’t ever. At this point I don’t really trust them to.

        Especially given their pinkerton start.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The same FBI that was dismissed by Trump when they looked into him, even though he was totally guilty? Or the same FBI that told civil rights protestors to kill themselves?

        The FBI is the Federal police for crimes the common man commits, not the rich.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember hoping that Obama would prosecute Bush for all of his crimes, in hindsight it was really naive.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Is lying about “weapons of mass destruction” in order to convince the country to invade another so the dickbag trio could get more wealthy legal? Cheney, Rumsfield and Bush agree I guess.

          Free speech and all would make lying legal, so I guess you’re right… Lawful evil it is then :/

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump is just a Captain Planet villain cosplayer.

          FTFY.

          Trump is simply not competent enough and never has been.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Bush wasn’t evil. He was a good man but in over his head. His entire cabinet was evil men that knew exactly what they were doing and they largely called all the shots

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why are you doing Bush apologia? He’s the one who appointed all those evil men and let them do evil stuff, which he did because he’s evil.

            • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because he was a puppet for his father. Blaming Bush for Cheneys actions does nothing but absolve Cheney and the other war criminals in his cabinet.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s like saying that you can’t hold Hitler responsible for war crimes or you’re just absolving Goebbels. Bush, Cheney, and all the rest of them are all war criminals who deserve the most severe legal punishment there is.

      • bcgm3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right? I hate that phrase as it’s used here. How are we supposed to move on when national traumas are left unresolved?

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t want Trump to win because he’s more likely to create a “presidential crimes commission” full of political appointees going after the other party.

    We have the legal system, if there are crimes they should be charged. The answer is not some additional political tribunal.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ha ha ha ha your legal system is the laughing stock of the planet

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Judge shopping and legislation via court ruling have called into question the fairness and legitimacy of a once ironclad judicial system. It’s being gamed right now by the wealthy and powerful to get what they want.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then the answer is fixing those issues. Saying the system isn’t working so we need to ignore it and build out a new system purpose built to prosecute my political opponents is like definitional fascism. We don’t need a strong man to fix everything extrajudicially, we just need the law applied fairly.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we can’t even get Trump to stop running despite being a convicted felon, I don’t even know if we can catch up with the next fucker. Dude could literally shoot someone on 5th Ave and the government would go “Well, they’re the president, what are you going to do about it?”

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Didn’t he directly say he could shoot someone and still win the (2016) election? I swear I remember seeing that he flat out said that, I think around the time of the Republican primary debates

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having convicted felon be able to run for office is a good thing. I don’t want a Navalny situation in my country.

      An insurrectionist, though? Fuck that noise. Trump should be hanged. He tried to violently overthrow the government.

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they don’t remove presidential immunity during the next president’s term in office we’ll be sitting on a time bomb of WHEN, not IF, a president uses that immunity to destroy our democracy.

      I mean, I know we’re probably all well aware that this is exactly why the immunity ruling was made and it makes it all the more dire that it be rectified and codified in unambiguously worded law as soon as possible.

  • Talisker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Haha yeah the government that’s currently enabling war crimes is gonna totally make a commission to hold presidents liable for crimes.

    This is why nothing changes. If you start looking at one of them you have to look at all of them.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    organize and take to the streets (and their pockets) if you want that to actually happen.

  • psycocan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    And they will be zionists because why not take the chance to covertly control the US decisions more?

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why Zionists specifically?

      Yes, I’m hoping you say something racist. It’s why I asked.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Being antizionist means you are against the Israeli government. Being antisemitic means you are prejudiced against Jews, Jewish faith etc. Two different things.

      • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think you know exactly what Zionism is then. It’s a political/social ideology. What does that have to do with racism? Maybe you were thinking of antisemitism?

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I thought the direction he was going in was Jews in general.

          It happens often enough.

      • psycocan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Zionism is literally jewish supremacy and pure racism. Enough with the gaslighting you PoS hasbara

        Also let me think, maybe look at the political status quo of the US where an Israeli national (Blinken) brought up by a mossad agent confidante (Epstein) is in charge of US foreign policy!!

        Maybe look at AIPAC that is bribing US policiticans and not registered as foreign agents.