Sorry I’m depressed af and need answers. Are y’all even real? What if y’all are just part of the program to torture me? What if this is a test? What if this is a VR simulation and the societal collapse is just moral character test to see if I would be do anything about it? Like imaginr a society in the far future like 26th century and in a history class where people are wondering “why didn’t the 21st century humans rise up against their oppressors” and then this VR simulation is just testing the students “what would you have done”

(Sorry for the bizzare question, its just brain chemicals acting weird today :P)

  • Shelena@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It is impossible to prove that it is the case that everything is fake and it is impossible that it isn’t. Lots of things like this we cannot know for sure. However, you parents being real, society being real etc is a less complex explanation than everything being a VR simulation. If you do not have additional information, then the less complex explanation often is the most likely. So, if you assume reality is not a simulation, you are more likely to be right.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s no way to break out of it if it is, so don’t get caught up thinking about it too hard. It’s better to live life as if it isn’t.

    When shit gets bad in my life I feel like this sometimes. The movie I Saw the TV Glow really fucked me up. I don’t think I can watch it again until I’m in a much better place and much happier about the state of the world. It just hit too close to home on too many of my anxieties. Like, obviously I didn’t think the movie was going to make me kill myself or something, but it really scared me how close it felt to that. It is so tempting to believe there is an escape hatch. To get out of the nightmare. But there isn’t. Looking for one is only going to bring you grief.

    Pursue your joy. Focus on what you’re thankful for.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think you would enjoy the concept of solipsism. We’re all just thinking computers driving around skeletons with flesh armor. Maybe our flesh mechs are part of the simulation too.

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I hear it’s amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Harry-curry Rock. I need scissors! 61!

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    With regard to the possibility that life is an elaborate trap or test, this (slightly long) extract from The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, might be a helpful perspective especially the bit I’ve made italic. I hope so, and I hope you feel better soon 👍


    Ford and Arthur continued their journey through the wood. A few hundred yards past the clearing they suddenly came upon a small pile of fruit lying in their path-berries that looked remarkably like raspberries and blackberries, and pulpy, green skinned fruit that looked remarkably like pears.

    So far they had steered clear of the fruit and berries they had seen, though the trees and bushed were laden with them.

    “Look at it this way,” Ford Prefect had said, “fruit and berries on strange planets either make you live or make you die. Therefore the point at which to start toying with them is when you’re going to die if you don’t. That way you stay ahead. The secret of healthy hitch-hiking is to eat junk food.”

    They looked at the pile that lay in their path with suspicion. It looked so good it made them almost dizzy with hunger.

    “Look at it this way,” said Ford, “er…”

    “Yes?” said Arthur.

    “I’m trying to think of a way of looking at it which means we get to eat it,” said Ford.

    The leaf-dappled sun gleamed on the pulp skins of the things which looked like pears. The things which looked like raspberries and strawberries were fatter and riper than any Arthur had ever seen, even in ice cream commercials.

    “Why don’t we eat them and think about it afterwards?” he said.

    “Maybe that’s what they want us to do.”

    “Alright, look at it this way…”

    “Sounds good so far.”

    “It’s there for us to eat. Either it’s good or it’s bad, either they want to feed us or to poison us. If it’s poisonous and we don’t eat it they’ll just attack us some other way. If we don’t eat, we lose out either way.”

    “I like the way you’re thinking,” said Ford, “Now eat one.”

    Hesitantly, Arthur picked up one of those things that looked like pears.

    “I always thought that about the Garden of Eden story,” said Ford.

    “Eh?”

    “Garden of Eden. Tree. Apple. That bit, remember?”

    “Yes of course I do.”

    “Your God person puts an apple tree in the middle of a garden and says do what you like guys, oh, but don’t eat the apple. Surprise surprise, they eat it and he leaps out from behind a bush shouting ‘Gotcha’. It wouldn’t have made any difference if they hadn’t eaten it.”

    “Why not?”

    “Because if you’re dealing with somebody who has the sort of mentality which likes leaving hats on the pavement with bricks under them you know perfectly well they won’t give up. They’ll get you in the end.”

    “What are you talking about?”

    “Never mind, eat the fruit.”

    “You know, this place almost looks like the Garden of Eden.”

    “Eat the fruit.”

    “Sounds quite like it too.”

    Arthur took a bite from the thing which looked like a pear.

    “It’s a pear,” he said.


  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. If you have no way of discerning what’s “real” or not, just play the game and try to enjoy it as much as you can without disrupting others’ enjoyment.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    First existential crisis? Don’t worry, they get easier after a few. The answer is simple once you learn how to embrace it: it doesn’t matter. Real, fake, it’s completely irrelevant. Go get high, play Halo, get some ice cream, and let somebody who gets paid to think about this stuff deal with it.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You’ll get better at it

        Either way, the answer is that we don’t know. We don’t know if we are real, we don’t know if you or I are real, we could all be part of a simulation, we could be an AI that some student built which is wandering in a virtual space.

        Hell, we could be a Bolzman brain for all we know.

        So it doesn’t really matter. What does matter is just be nice to those around you. Assume they’re all real and alive and can feel hurt, can feel pain, can feel scared, just like you.

        Just be nice to everyone else, try to leave each space a little better than it was when you arrive there. Do that with life and whatever is real, you’d be awesome at it

  • The simulated universe hypothesis is not impossible, nor is Azathoth’s dream (essentially the same scenario just in neurons rather than silicon or whatever). But even if the universe is purely material it doesn’t make us more or less real.

    We’re tiny. If we vanished next century, the universe would thrum on not even noticing.

    So there are no rules. You exist for whatever, or npt for whatever.

    However, we assume every menace has agency (part of our survival programming) and we anthropomorphize concepts like death or time or nature. So you can assume we all have the agency of a rainstorm or a wildfire, and be fine.

    I lost a lot this year, including my society. So I don’t have any real answers. I continue on in a leap of faith that I’ll see light again if I continue down the tunnel. Even if its an oncoming train.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So first off existence vs what is the reality of existence is sorta two different thing. Descartes pretty much sums it up there which is kind of funny as it did not really click when I was younger but I finally sorta got it. My reality starts with my thoughts. Having thoughts means I exist in terms of if existence is a thing. If my existence is false my concept of existence is false and therefore I have a false existence that I see as existence which is a type of existence. From there it gets a bit more difficult but follows sorta the same. With your thoughts you have perceptions. They could be true or they could be false but from your perspective your perceptions come at you relatively consistently with your actions so either way they functionally are a type of existence. When it comes to others they appear to have knowledge I do not and I learn things from them and the world. So there is some independent existence to them. There is a possibility of a false existence that is completely encompassed by you but if that is the case then you apparently hide knowledge from yourself till it fits the story. Once again regardless the nature of the existence you perceive and interact with works with the best consistency if you interact with people as if they are their own independent existent beings. So for all practical purposes they exist. As you can see it pretty much continues on with WYSIWYG. What you see (experience) is what you get.

  • last_philosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    You can kinda guess the world is real because of the CAP theorem. Hear me out.

    1. The CAP theorem says a computing system cannot perfectly have all 3 of: Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance (division of some parts of a distributed system from another). We’ll assume this is true and somewhat dubiously assume this applies to any simulated universe
    2. Availability is a necessity. A simulated universe that suddenly starts lagging or buffering would mean the jig would be up pretty quickly. You’d probably want a distributed system that can spin up new computing instances instantly, but that brings up issues with partitioning…
    3. But lack of partition tolerance would make it pretty obvious that the universe is fake, because some parts of it would be inaccessible. So can’t sacrifice that.
    4. Therefore, the only thing left is consistency. A simulated universe would need some kind of inconsistency. In a web site, this might mean content is available to users in some areas but not others. In a simulated universe, we’d expect people in some areas to have a different experience of objective reality than others. But there’s no evidence of this ever happening, unless you wanna go down some Mandela effect rabbit hole.
    5. That leaves us with the conclusion that the universe is not a computing system at all, but rather a thing in itself. It doesn’t need to stay consistent because it is consistent fundamentally.
    6. Also, let’s just ignore relativistic speed limits and quantum mechanics entirely.
    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      CAP theorem is about distributed computing, there’s no reason to not believe the universe simply runs on a single processor though. Video games have 3d space and can run on one processor. So that would allow consistency and availability.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    It may very well all be fake and you’re living in a simulation.

    That doesn’t matter though. It doesn’t change anything. That simulation is all you’ve got so you either play along or you end it for yourself. The only thing that is undeniable is consciousness - the fact of experience. That it feels like something to be. Any story about your existence that you add on top of that is just thinking. It’s appereances in consciousness.