Summary

Donald Trump announced new tariffs against China, Mexico, and Canada, sparking market turmoil as the measures were set to begin this weekend.

Following the announcement, major indices plunged, with the Dow Jones, NASDAQ, and S&P 500 suffering significant losses, reflecting investor anxiety across global markets.

Canada, Mexico, and China vowed retaliatory tariffs, with officials warning that these measures could escalate trade conflicts and significantly harm economic stability.

Critics argue the tariffs will harm consumers and businesses, creating global trade uncertainty and risking prolonged economic challenges in the United States.

  • scratsearcher 🔍🔮📊🎲@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This tariff war inside north America is unprecedented since 1945. We will need more Data to evaluate consequences and clearly distinguish random market fluctuations from real consequences; remind me in 10 days/months/years. Capital flows might still strengthen the Dollar in the short term, as countries who depend on exporting commodities (namely oil/coal/wood) into the US will attempt to lower prices to compete with domestic US producers …

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Could this finally be the term that Trump speedruns the economy crash so the Republicans can be properly blamed for it happening due to their policies and leadership, rather than the Dems always inheriting a timebomb and wasting a whole ass term fixing it?

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Trump is already running with the line that the helicopter/plane collision was somehow Biden’s fault, even though Trump and “Justin Hammer” fucked with the FAA. That’s probably why they are speedrunning this collapse, they want to claim they inherited a mess, and shift blame for the consequences of their actions.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Which is one of two reasons why they keep screeching this “DEI Hires did 9/11!” nonsense

        1. It’s the only card they have for claiming Biden is responsible for Trump’s blunders
        2. It’s to manufacture consent for Trump’s plan to repeal the Civil Rights Act “in the interest of public safety”
  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you are a non-Trump voter in a red state, especially if you work for the flagship company or industry in that state, I would like to apologize on behalf of all Canadians for what our government is about to do. We don’t want to do it but it is the only way to deal with a bully.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I would like to apologize on behalf of all Canadians for what our government is about to do.

      Awfully nice of you Canadians to apologize in advance for defending yourselves - eh?

    • CircuitGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We don’t want to do it but it is the only way to deal with a bully. I think tariffs are bad for the people of the country that levies them. If another country puts a tariff on things my country sells, I’m for unilaterally disarming. Let the other country’s people enjoy the dubious industry-protecting benefits of that tax, and let us enjoy the benefits of buying whatever is a good deal.

      I think it’s nonsense to think that when people freely trade money for goods, the person receiving the money “wins” and the person receiving the goods “loses”. They made the trade because it was good for both parties.

      I’m American, and we’re pursing the opposite of what I think is good policy.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, the scenarios where a breakup of the union is feasible are… limited. Governors aren’t going to be able to seize the nukes or military assets needed to establish themselves on their own without some truly extraordinary changes that just haven’t come into being yet. Maybe one day, but it’s going to be a damned rough road before we get there.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Tariffs are the opposite of a “free market” measure and absolutely choke an interconnected economy. Look at the damage done to Cuba or North Korea by sanctions, it’s the same principle. Getting to the real meat of why this is happening is like a forensic case study. Doesn’t even benefit Trump unless he basically immediately reverses it and gives the old “see they capitulated to my demands” based on whatever random thing he dredges up.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Yea! That’s the way Republicans and Trump support the economy!

    I wonder if we outsiders have to rebuild the American economy with foreign aid and a new Marshall plan in 2029…

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I hope so, for the love of God please… America cannot be left to its own devices, Americans will die if that happens.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Critics argue the tariffs will harm consumers and businesses, creating global trade uncertainty and risking prolonged economic challenges in the United States.

    God damn it media, can’t we just call a fucking spade a spade. Anyone with a fucking functional brain knows these tariffs will harm consumers and businesses. “Critics,” my ass. Informed people, more like.

    It’s this kind of shit that allowed us to get here to begin with, an unwillingness to just say the painful, obvious truth and speak it to power.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 day ago

      It will harm consumers and small businesses way more than it will harm the big corporations. And that’s exactly the goal: consolidate the government by crippling their biggest enemy in the middle-class. It’s how fascism operates: make sure only your supporters survive.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        The big corporations already planned their loopholes into the order. For them, this helps them consolidate power by driving smaller businesses out, or to where they’re forced to sell.

        Hanlon’s Razor does not apply to this administration. It is malice. They know exactly what they’re doing.

      • FatCrab@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I really think this is wrong. These moves arguably harm large business even more than small ones because the complex supply chains that go into most large corporations’ goods are getting totally fucked by these tarrifs and the supplier agreements locking them probably more often than not do not give them a clear out for situations where the dumbest motherfuckers in the country elected their chief dumb motherfucker into the highest seat.

        Regardless, the ones most hurt by this are consumers, and especially those without the means and/or ability accommodate this fuckery.

        • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The complex supply chains are just as important for small businesses, but the small businesses have no leverage and are powerless to do anything about them.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There are lots of good opinion pieces out there that satisfy your needs in that regard, but at its core, journalism should just be taking sources and presenting it in a way that people can read easily. Newspapers usually dont claim anything themselves, they just repeat claims made by other people. Thats not a bad thing, thats just how this works.

    • Sho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Where are all of the “I’m worried about the economy” voters at? Come on be loud and proud!

  • korendian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m looking at both the dow and the nasdaq, and they look fine. Where is this “plummet” the article is referring to? Not that I think the tariffs are good, but let’s be truthful.

    • ryrybang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Right? -0.5% yesterday, -1.0% for the week. Totally normal and not deserving of any kind of adjective.

      Certainly not saying Lady Trump’s actions won’t kill the stock market, but this ain’t it yet.

    • joel1974@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It didn’t. It dropped 300+ points. People are just waiting for the plummet. This is an omen to us. Tariffs are being imposed today and Monday will probably be a bad day.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      0.01% drop = plummet

      0.01% rise = soar

      It’s the law of finance headline writing

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not exactly what I would classify as a plummet, but we were seeing green numbers for the day and then they subsequently turned down once this was announced.

      Still too early to say whether we’re going to be looking at any form of sharp downturn.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Starting just after 11 AM EST, the S&P went down over 1%. It’s not a steep plunge; that kind of swing happened on Monday for AI, too, IIRC.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not sure what the article is talking about. I’m sure once tariffs are announced it will drop tho. But that’s a problem for monday.

    • TsarVul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      What do you mean? It did fall and the article links to each respective stock. As of writing this comment, DJI fell 337 points, NASDAQ fell 54, S&P 500 fell 30 points.

      They are being truthful.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Going down less than one percent is the opposite of a ‘plummet.’ It is literally indistinguishable from a normal daily fluctuation.

        Furthermore, the market has overall gone up since.

        • TsarVul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          OK but they did fall rapidly, and one can only surmise it’s because of the announcement of more tariffs.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The market is driven by emotion, which is why doing anything other than long term investing is risky. I’m sure the fluctuation was connected to his tariff announcements. You want to see a real fall? Wait until the tariffs become a thing and people realize he’s screwed up a functional system. I wonder how fast one can backtrack such things? If it wasn’t for the harm done to so many people, I’d love to see if it’s a Brexit level mess, or just a temporary hiccup once they reverse course.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Seems more like a Liz Truss level mess. Unfortunately, unlike the UK, in the US system it’s effectively impossible to remove their leader from power. So they’re stuck with him even after he craters the economy.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Just an anecdote, but I sold all my SPY yesterday. I kept some more conservative investments in but I think once people see inflation from the tariffs it will drop.

            • TsarVul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Right, absolutely. I’m not saying that Herr Drumpf just kickstarted a recession and neither do I think that’s the claim that the article is trying to make. The market, however, had a very clear reaction to just the MENTION of tariffs. What happens when the details to these tariffs are released? What happens when they are actually implemented?

              • Rhaedas@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                It will react with more details similarly. Like I said, it’s putting them into place that’s the real hit, and it will be much more than a stock market drop. I suppose tariffs do have a place in some circumstances, but he’s throwing darts, and none of them are stuck in the target.

              • SamboT@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Why are you posing as an authority on this? Its painfully obvious youre talking out of your ass.

                • TsarVul@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  I never said I was. Trump promised tariffs on EU countries and stocks went down. I’ll grant you they didn’t go down by a lot, but I don’t think the article was being disingenuous.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right. The S and P 500 went down 0.5% yesterday, it’s a pretty typical trading day and still up over the last five days, month, six months and the year.

      Trumps a lunatic, but one thing he does understand is business.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Trumps a lunatic, but one thing he does understand is business.

        This is mostly a branding thing, he’s not actually particularly good at running businesses.

        I’ll give him that he’s somewhat of an expert in avoiding any form of accountability.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        22 hours ago

        He seems to understand shell companies, tax avoidance, cheating your contractors, and strategic bankruptcy. He understands shilling for sponsors buying and selling favors, fleecing the rubes. I guess those are business strategies but there’s no evidence he understands ethical business.

      • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Numerous failed businesses and bankruptcies beg to differ.

        What Trump understands is marketing. A stupid enough audience, tell them lies with enough confidence, and they will let Trump fleece them like sheep.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hold on now, that was a NASDAQ loss of nearly 0.75%. If the Americans do that 134 times in a row, all their money will be gone! How would they buy their eggs? /s

        • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          If you’re going to “well, ACKchyuallllly” someone, it helps to have any idea what you’re talking about.

          The DOW “plummeted” 337,47 points from 44.882,13 to 44.544,66, a reduction of ~0,75%. Given the drop wasn’t percentage based but was additionally expressed as a percentage of the previous closing price for context, it would require an additional ~132 similar drops to reach zero.

          Now, you’re probably noticing I listed the DOW and ~132 drops here versus NASDAQ and 134 drops prior. That’s because I was making a joke and was not much concerned about details. This is because, unlike certain individuals, I am not one of the most insufferable types of people: the pedant.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of the funniest things I read was a WSJ article on tariffs, in the comment section. Along with a lot of copium about how they, personally, don’t buy such items, some dumbass bitching that WSJ - that’s right, the Wall Street Journal - is showing their bias against donvict.

    https://archive.is/wbet5

    The ONLY gloom and doom articles I saw in WSJ during Biden’s high inflation term were in the opinion section. Your bias is clearly showing …

    Apparently, reporting on items likely to be affected by the donvict taxes on goods is “bias”. That WSJ, always known for their extremist progressive WOKE agenda and their “TDS”. LOL

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    NGL it’d be cool if VYM dropped to $77 again, I’d like to buy into more of that.

    Right now it’s worth $132 even though the dividends get adjusted down to if the stock was worth roughly $100.

  • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    And hedge funds keep betting against the fucking economy. 401ks, savings, and pensions will all be effected. They want to steal your money.