Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Via a prev sneer, here’s a Bloomberg post about call center workers being accused of being LLMs:

    https://archive.is/K3N51

    I used to work in a call-center adjacent industry and the amount of crap some employers used to make sure their workers sounded as much as robots as possible was astounding.

  • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    noticed someone like “comments are lazy! never use them! write better code!”

    A:

    • I’m paid for doing the job, I’m not paid to be not lazy.
    • comments are fucking useful
      • mlen@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Depends on how they are used. They are extremely useful when they add context that is otherwise not present in the code, but way too often I see people simply restating what the code does in the comment. That’s not very useful and can become confusing if the code later gets updated without updating the associated comment.

        • Architeuthis@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          this seems counterintuitive but… comments are the best, name of the function but longer are the worst. Plain text summary of a huge chunk of code that I really should have taken the time to break up instead of writing a novella about it are somewhere in the middle.

          I feel a lot of bad comment practices are downstream of javascript relying on jsdoc to act like a real language.

      • misterbngo@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’ve found that people who talk about “code smell” generally should not be listened to as it’s entirely vibes-based-on-the-last-medium-post-i-read-this-morning. I had a dipshit manager tell me that he didn’t like my use of decorators (in python mind you) because it was a “code smell” and recommended I read “clean” code, and I immediately threw every other opinion he had in the trash.

        • Architeuthis@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Managers gonna manage, but having a term for bad code that works that is more palatable than ‘amateur hour’ isn’t inherently bad imo.

          Worst i’ve heard is some company forbidding LINQ in C#, which in python terms is forcing you to always use for-loops in place of filter/map/reduce and comprehensions and other stuff like pandas.groupby

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      uggggh yep sorry, I meant to deploy some changes that would mitigate this a couple nights ago but had a bunch of things crop up. I’ll do my best to work it in tonight!

      some specifics for the changes to expect:

      • iocaine finally
      • some better nginx settings to kill likely scraper connections faster
    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      current issue is likely the most recent bout scraper waves (based on it matching data myself and others have seen elsewhere); suggestions have been made, so hopefully soon™ changes

      (don’t mean to speak on @self’s behalf ito plans, mind. that’s for them to do :D)

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Guys, it’s a problem that GenPop thinks “AI” is useless, because that means they will deny the inevitable coming existence of the Evil Robot God and make it harder to stop it

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/W2dTrfTsGtFiwG5hM/origins-and-dangers-of-future-ai-capability-denial

    The whole thing has to be read to be believed. But there are some fun nuggets:

    • saying that an evil robot god is coming is Rational. Doubting that is a conspiracy theory
    • slagging flat-earthers on LW is truly the pot calling the kettle black
    • “I can imagine a world where AI becomes extremely good at flipping burgers or driving cars well before it learns how to write software or detect cancer. In that case, I think it’s a lot harder to deny its achievements. But in our world, a lot of AI’s greatest achievements take context to understand, like protein folding or playing board games.” - yeah sure buddy all the pro board game players are quaking in their boots
    • rook@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I can imagine a world where AI becomes extremely good at flipping burgers or driving cars well before it learns how to write software or […] protein folding or playing board games

      That’s because despite Moravec’s paradox being noted down in the 80s (y’know, the last ai winter) there’s still a certain kind of asshole who thinks that flipping burgers is an easy task performed by stupid people but playing go is somehow the height of human intellect, despite 40+ years of evidence to the contrary.

    • aio@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, it is true that computer programs have far surpassed humans in board games. They are very well suited for it. It just has nothing to do with the hypothesized abilities of future “AI” as rationalists conceive them.

    • sansruse@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      i’m only at the beginning, but this already stuck out to me:

      It would be extremely bad if many people come to believe this: arguments about existential risk mostly rely on the assumption that AI is capable, so they fall flat for people who don’t agree with that. I think we should be emphasizing the core capability of AI more and talking about x-risks less.

      “Guys we need to pump this bubble Rational Stock Appreciation Trend more, the plebs are starting to think it’s all bullshit!!”

  • antifuchs@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    In lighter news, this anti-LLM rhyme made me chuckle:

    I will not talk with a chatbot
    I do not want it while I shop

    I do not want it on Windows X-box
    I do not want it in Firefox

    I do not want it in my house
    I do not want it on my mouse
    I do not want it here or there
    I do not want it anywhere.

    I do not want AI and Spam
    I do not want them Sam-Alt-Man

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    For something lighter, here’s an AI bro getting wowed by the shittiest “video game” I’ve ever seen (trust me, the screenshot doesn’t do it justice):

    In lieu of sneering this shit, I’d like to argue that arts education should become mandatory for all students post-bubble, regardless of their profession. STEM, humanities, tech, doesn’t matter - give them four years of art so they don’t turn out like this guy.

    • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The glasses also support prescription lenses along with transitional lenses that automatically adjust to light.

      Actual prescription lenses or generic supermarket lenses?

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      holy discontiguous interscene blending, watman

      there are so many parts that people in the skeet[0] replies have already pointed at but the thing that someone just went “tune the smoother way up! just make sure it looks good!” and thought they were done with the assignment… amazing. really does a fantastic job of highlighting the same old problem of these things only managing short-duration outputs coherently!

      10/10 would cringe again

      0 - what’s a blacksky skeet called? do they have their own term? I don’t know how standalone blacksky operates and I refuse to learn any more about skeeterprotocol than I already know

    • misterbngo@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I literally can’t even.

      As someone who spent countless hours of my youth in hammer, laying out areas with props and lighting and doing play testing about areal movement with test npcs, it’s hilarious that these people see this slop and say, yes this is the future.

      also : “I’m working on a theory that “AI is art” boosters have some kind of limited ability to perceive details. Like they literally only perceive large shapes, colors, and noises. Anything remotely more detailed than ‘big thing go boom’ they actually lack the ability to see it.” 🤔🤔🤔

      also: after discussing with my brother I came to the realization that this rube was likely very into the “play2earn” bullshit during the nft era

    • Erik@fosstodon.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      @BlueMonday1984

      Wow. What a statement:

      “At the end of the day, Omarchy is a developer vanity project with marketing polish. A beautifully themed, slightly dangerous, over-engineered dotfile bomb.”

  • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    https://eepy.moe/notes/ae7rhgxvpw8d09kw

    Moderator actions Moderators may hide, delete, or issue a warning if a post includes any of the following:

    • Harassment or threats: Any comments, posts, or replies that attack, demean, or intimidate an individual or group (e.g., homophobic slurs, anti-trans sentiment, calling other users “Nazis” or “fascists”, etc.
  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    today in I fucking called it fedora aka mostly red hat has decided to allow slop code in a way that violates even their utterly mid stated principles around the tech

    if you’re downstream from any fedora packages (and I don’t know the scope of this policy so it might be safe to consider anything owned by red hat in general to be tainted — yes I realize most of us are downstream from a bunch of red hat shit) it might be time to evaluate an alternative if available

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does anyone else get flashbacks to that episode of the Powerpuff girls where the villain takes over the city and makes a law that “crime is now legal”? Because that keeps popping into my head for some reason.