Like, we’ll probably find out that eating boogers actually makes you immune to select illnesses or something crazy like that.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 days ago

    Causal relationship between social media and degradation of basic critical thinking skills. Not just tiktok, anything in which people are primarily communicating asynchronously and has a “reward” (likes, upvotes, etc)

    So Reddit/Lemmy for sure included

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 days ago

    Solid proof that the source of all life on this planet actually began on a different world. The critical components came here via a comet or even an spacecraft that inadvertently dropped it off. Should screw with a lot of ideals

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      You still have to come up with the explanation of what started life in the first place!

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 days ago

        This is always my reaction to this theory as well. If someone asks “How did life on Earth start?”, surely we can assume they actually mean “How did life start?”

        It’s like if a kid saw a baby, and asks their parents “Where do babies come from?”, and their reply is “Oh that baby lives next door, it came from that house”.

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Id expand on this. I think the entire solar system has microbial life. Every crack it can exist it will. Asteroids, comets, the gas giants. Its likely all related too. Itd be mostly underground tho and hard to find. Probably multicellular life in some cases too like ice moons, and underground on mars in cave systems.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      likewise, alien life probably even if just microbial would throw a monkeywrench in a lot of folks beilef system

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I thought we had evidence that life was seeded from off world? don’t have sources right now but i remember coming by an article explaining that.

  • mortalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’ve got a couple that roll around in my head, radiation therapy will be seen as barbaric at some point. Assuming we don’t burn ourselves off this earth in the next few years I think we’ll see some progress on this. Moderna is known for their COVID shot, however they have basically eliminated melanoma with a tailored injection. Last I looked at it, it was in it’s mid stage or something and was almost 100% effective.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 days ago

      radiation therapy will be seen as barbaric at some point.

      We already know it’s barbaric. It’s a last resort. It kills you and the cancer, only the cancer gets the worst of it. It’s a terrible solution to the problem, only a step better than death.

    • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 days ago

      Honestly most cancer therapy is like that. Chemo and radio are basically working on the fact that your body is more resilient than cancer cells so they will likely die before you do. They are not pleasant things to go through. Surgery is your best option if it’s available and that involves chopping out chunks of yourself.

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Radiation therapy is bad. We know that, its a last resort tool to fight cancer. Once we find something to finally kill cancer before getting to that stage, i hope to see no more use of such treatment.

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I consider Extended Wigners Friend Problem Experiment to be quite fascinating. This experiment has already been performed, but I expect its results to be fully understood by the masses. And I am not proffesional physicist and want to understand it better too by myself. a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality The results of this experiment call into question one or more assumptions about the existence of objective reality, freedom of choice, or locality. All three cannot exist together. But personally, I think that the second and third points have been checked a lot of times, so no matter how improbable it may seem, the first point is the most likely. But what it really means remains to be understood.

      • JustVik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Sorry for this website it’s not some special website, just one of many website describing the experiment. You can search in internet for better site with review of this experiment(Extended Wigners Friend Experiment).

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    I would like something proves the “interconnectedness of all things” as Douglas Adams put it……something that proves individualism is a disease or a flaw, that could be eliminated, unlocking whole earth potential.

    I would settle for evidence of Gaia theory that proves if humans don’t get our shit together, Mother Earth will give someone else a chance .

  • Theo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    Microplastics and penile length. Seen some studies recently though lol.

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    A consistent model for the expansion of the universe that explains the different rates observed

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      Was going to post this. Not very sanitary (hand washing first is required) or attractive, but it is good for your immune system in the long run. Ken Jennings, the jeopardy guy mentions it in his book.

    • Pyrin@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      That may actually explain why I rarely get sick. I’m having a hard time remembering a single day of this year where I was sick that wasn’t caused by things like eating uncooked foods or something else of that nature.

  • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    Aspartame cures cancer, but only when ingested in soda.

    Pi equals exactly 3.

    The most effective, universal vaccine is based on asbestos.

  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    I think it’ll be wild if AI actually becomes incredibly intelligent. I’m thinking specifically about materials and what crazy new one AI could dream up but at a level that would require it to actually think and not regurgitate some LLM data it scraped.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      what crazy new one AI could dream up but at a level that would require it to actually think and not regurgitate some LLM data it scraped.

      A LLM wouldn’t be useful but I wonder how far this can be done without AI (machine learning) technology, just programmatically like with protein folding simulations.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    If it turns out there really is no free will. What will happen? Do we get a kind Utopia? Or fascism where you are mistreated based on your lot in life?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s no functional difference, unless you can accurately predict someone’s actions, and to do that you’d need to predict the environment in which someone is making choices as well, which requires omniscience. So, there’s no functional difference.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yes, but if there is true free will, the universe would not be perfectly predictable. If it is, then there could not be free will. Luckily, it isn’t.

          • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            I would say deterministic rather than predictable.

            I think the universe is deterministic and that there isn’t something inside our heads that bypasses determinism and creates free will.

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              But we know for sure that the universe is not deterministic.

              From a fundamental level, it is probabilistic.

              Simple experiments can show this chaotic action.
              Take for example the dripping tap experiment. The time for next drop cannot be predicted by knowing the timing of the previous drops!
              This is not a random process, there is a pattern, but it is also clearly not deterministic.

              • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                We can’t predict it because we can’t possibly know everything. But unpredictably isn’t the same as randomness or implies nondeterministic behaviour.

                • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  If you are really interested, look into the uncertainty principle.

                  At this point in science we are as convinced as is possible to be; that the universe is probabilistic in nature.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Remember the reasons we have punishments? To discourage further misdeeds. Also, to restore justice by inflicting suffering on those who deserve it. Punishments would still be dished out for pragmatic reasons, but retributive punishment would be rendered entirely meaningless.

        It would also shatter all sense of acomplishment an individual could have. All that would be left is maybe a perverse pride in knowing you where born “better” than others.

        I don’t think society would survive if it was a common knowledge.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          Like I said, how can you prove that free will exists now? We could very well already live in your scenario, and the world isn’t ending because of a lack of free will (if it doesn’t exist). I mean, it is ending, but not because of free will or the lack thereof.