• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 28th, 2023

help-circle


  • Anyone who thinks VAR will be axed are kidding themselves.

    Sure it isn’t perfect and it makes mistakes but the bottom line is that with VAR we get more correct decisions than we get without it. It’s not 100% correct decisions but it’s more than when it isn’t there so there is zero chance it goes away.

    What people like Gary O’Neil need to do is come up with ways to help improve VAR and work with the referees instead of claiming it should be binned off as that’s just unhelpful.









  • There’s been articles on this in recent years. It seems black referees in particular move up the refereeing ranks and then once it starts getting to serious professional levels the FA or a referees body (I’m not sure which) just doesn’t put them through to the next level so they can’t move up the leagues anymore which surely has to be questioned by the football governing bodies.

    There was a black premier league referee many years ago called Uriah Rennie and he was very good. It’s a shame he’s been the only one.


  • I’m a Man United fan so it’s a bit United heavy but here’s the ones I’ve read.

    My favourite ones: Roy Keane, Gary Neville, Kieron Dyer

    Average ones you can maybe try: Jamie Vardy, Peter Crouch, Andrea Pirlo

    Crap ones: Carlo Ancelotti, Andrew Cole

    Terrible ones: Paul Scholes (it’s basically a photo book with him commenting on the pictures)

    I currently have Wenger, Carrick and Evras books on my shelf to read next.


  • Best trajectory is clearly Man City then probably Newcastle due to the financial backing and the income from the huge stadium and fan base allowing high spending.

    Worst trajectory is a tough one because none of them are on a bad trajectory but I suppose Liverpool because their owners aren’t investing as much in the team as the other sides and if Klopp leaves and they get the next appointment wrong they will drop off a bit in comparison to others.



  • I really don’t get why people complain about fouls being slowed down. It makes it easier for the officials to see what happened, where were any points of contact and what part of the foot was used. Without this they would have to guess and just make even more errors. It’s not like it changes what happened it just gives them a better view and that’s all.

    “It always looks worse in slow motion” - irrelevant. It’s the same challenge regardless it’s just a more informed opinion with all the facts when viewed slowed.